mirror of
				https://github.com/Klipper3d/klipper.git
				synced 2025-10-31 18:36:09 +01:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			429 lines
		
	
	
		
			16 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			429 lines
		
	
	
		
			16 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Benchmarks
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document describes Klipper benchmarks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Micro-controller Benchmarks
 | |
| 
 | |
| This section describes the mechanism used to generate the Klipper
 | |
| micro-controller step rate benchmarks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The primary goal of the benchmarks is to provide a consistent
 | |
| mechanism for measuring the impact of coding changes within the
 | |
| software. A secondary goal is to provide high-level metrics for
 | |
| comparing the performance between chips and between software
 | |
| platforms.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The step rate benchmark is designed to find the maximum stepping rate
 | |
| that the hardware and software can reach. This benchmark stepping rate
 | |
| is not achievable in day-to-day use as Klipper needs to perform other
 | |
| tasks (eg, mcu/host communication, temperature reading, endstop
 | |
| checking) in any real-world usage.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In general, the pins for the benchmark tests are chosen to flash LEDs
 | |
| or other innocuous pins. **Always verify that it is safe to drive the
 | |
| configured pins prior to running a benchmark.** It is not recommended
 | |
| to drive an actual stepper during a benchmark.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Step rate benchmark test
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test is performed using the console.py tool (described in
 | |
| [Debugging.md](Debugging.md)). The micro-controller is configured for
 | |
| the particular hardware platform (see below) and then the following is
 | |
| cut-and-paste into the console.py terminal window:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| SET start_clock {clock+freq}
 | |
| SET ticks 1000
 | |
| 
 | |
| reset_step_clock oid=0 clock={start_clock}
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=0 dir=0
 | |
| queue_step oid=0 interval={ticks} count=60000 add=0
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=0 dir=1
 | |
| queue_step oid=0 interval=3000 count=1 add=0
 | |
| 
 | |
| reset_step_clock oid=1 clock={start_clock}
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=1 dir=0
 | |
| queue_step oid=1 interval={ticks} count=60000 add=0
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=1 dir=1
 | |
| queue_step oid=1 interval=3000 count=1 add=0
 | |
| 
 | |
| reset_step_clock oid=2 clock={start_clock}
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=2 dir=0
 | |
| queue_step oid=2 interval={ticks} count=60000 add=0
 | |
| set_next_step_dir oid=2 dir=1
 | |
| queue_step oid=2 interval=3000 count=1 add=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The above tests three steppers simultaneously stepping. If running the
 | |
| above results in a "Rescheduled timer in the past" or "Stepper too far
 | |
| in past" error then it indicates the `ticks` parameter is too low (it
 | |
| results in a stepping rate that is too fast). The goal is to find the
 | |
| lowest setting of the ticks parameter that reliably results in a
 | |
| successful completion of the test. It should be possible to bisect the
 | |
| ticks parameter until a stable value is found.
 | |
| 
 | |
| On a failure, one can copy-and-paste the following to clear the error
 | |
| in preparation for the next test:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| clear_shutdown
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| To obtain the single stepper benchmarks, the same configuration
 | |
| sequence is used, but only the first block of the above test is
 | |
| cut-and-paste into the console.py window.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To produce the benchmarks found in the [Features](Features.md) document, the total
 | |
| number of steps per second is calculated by multiplying the number of
 | |
| active steppers with the nominal mcu frequency and dividing by the
 | |
| final ticks parameter. The results are rounded to the nearest K. For
 | |
| example, with three active steppers:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| ECHO Test result is: {"%.0fK" % (3. * freq / ticks / 1000.)}
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The benchmarks are run with parameters suitable for TMC Drivers. For
 | |
| micro-controllers that support `STEPPER_BOTH_EDGE=1` (as reported in
 | |
| the `MCU config` line when console.py first starts) use
 | |
| `step_pulse_duration=0` and `invert_step=-1` to enable optimized
 | |
| stepping on both edges of the step pulse. For other micro-controllers
 | |
| use a `step_pulse_duration` corresponding to 100ns.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### AVR step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on AVR chips:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PA5 dir_pin=PA4 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=32
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PA3 dir_pin=PA2 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=32
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PC7 dir_pin=PC6 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=32
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version `avr-gcc
 | |
| (GCC) 5.4.0`. Both the 16Mhz and 20Mhz tests were run using simulavr
 | |
| configured for an atmega644p (previous tests have confirmed simulavr
 | |
| results match tests on both a 16Mhz at90usb and a 16Mhz atmega2560).
 | |
| 
 | |
| | avr              | ticks |
 | |
| | ---------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper        | 102   |
 | |
| | 3 stepper        | 486   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Arduino Due step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the Due:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PB27 dir_pin=PA21 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PB26 dir_pin=PC30 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PA21 dir_pin=PC30 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | sam3x8e              | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 66    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 257   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Duet Maestro step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the Duet Maestro:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PC26 dir_pin=PC18 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PC26 dir_pin=PA8 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PC26 dir_pin=PB4 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | sam4s8c              | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 71    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 260   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Duet Wifi step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the Duet Wifi:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PD6 dir_pin=PD11 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PD7 dir_pin=PD12 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PD8 dir_pin=PD13 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `gcc version 10.3.1 20210621 (release) (GNU Arm Embedded Toolchain 10.3-2021.07)`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | sam4e8e          | ticks |
 | |
| | ---------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper        | 48    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper        | 215   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Beaglebone PRU step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the PRU:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=gpio0_23 dir_pin=gpio1_12 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=20
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=gpio1_15 dir_pin=gpio0_26 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=20
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=gpio0_22 dir_pin=gpio2_1 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=20
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version `pru-gcc
 | |
| (GCC) 8.0.0 20170530 (experimental)`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | pru              | ticks |
 | |
| | ---------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper        | 231   |
 | |
| | 3 stepper        | 847   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### STM32F042 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the STM32F042:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PA1 dir_pin=PA2 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PA3 dir_pin=PA2 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PB8 dir_pin=PA2 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | stm32f042        | ticks |
 | |
| | ---------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper        | 59    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper        | 249   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### STM32F103 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the STM32F103:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PC13 dir_pin=PB5 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PB3 dir_pin=PB6 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PA4 dir_pin=PB7 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | stm32f103            | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 61    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 264   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### STM32F4 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the STM32F4:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PA5 dir_pin=PB5 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PB2 dir_pin=PB6 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PB3 dir_pin=PB7 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`. The STM32F407
 | |
| results were obtained by running an STM32F407 binary on an STM32F446
 | |
| (and thus using a 168Mhz clock).
 | |
| 
 | |
| | stm32f446            | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 46    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 205   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| | stm32f407            | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 46    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 205   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### STM32G0B1 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the STM32G0B1:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PB13 dir_pin=PB12 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PB10 dir_pin=PB2 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PB0 dir_pin=PC5 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `247cd753` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | stm32f042        | ticks |
 | |
| | ---------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper        | 58    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper        | 243   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### LPC176x step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the LPC176x:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=P1.20 dir_pin=P1.18 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=P1.21 dir_pin=P1.18 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=P1.23 dir_pin=P1.18 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0`. The 120Mhz LPC1769
 | |
| results were obtained by overclocking an LPC1768 to 120Mhz.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | lpc1768              | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 52    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 222   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| | lpc1769              | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 51    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 222   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### SAMD21 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the SAMD21:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PA27 dir_pin=PA20 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PB3 dir_pin=PA21 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PA17 dir_pin=PA21 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0` on a SAMD21G18
 | |
| micro-controller.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | samd21               | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 70    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 306   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### SAMD51 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the SAMD51:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=PA22 dir_pin=PA20 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=PA22 dir_pin=PA21 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=PA22 dir_pin=PA19 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0` on a SAMD51J19A
 | |
| micro-controller.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | samd51               | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 39    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 191   |
 | |
| | 1 stepper (200Mhz)   | 39    |
 | |
| | 3 stepper (200Mhz)   | 181   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### RP2040 step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on the RP2040:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=gpio25 dir_pin=gpio3 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=gpio26 dir_pin=gpio4 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=gpio27 dir_pin=gpio5 invert_step=-1 step_pulse_ticks=0
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0` on a Raspberry Pi
 | |
| Pico board.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | rp2040               | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 5     |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 22    |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Linux MCU step rate benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following configuration sequence is used on a Raspberry Pi:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| allocate_oids count=3
 | |
| config_stepper oid=0 step_pin=gpio2 dir_pin=gpio3 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=5
 | |
| config_stepper oid=1 step_pin=gpio4 dir_pin=gpio5 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=5
 | |
| config_stepper oid=2 step_pin=gpio6 dir_pin=gpio17 invert_step=0 step_pulse_ticks=5
 | |
| finalize_config crc=0
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test was last run on commit `59314d99` with gcc version
 | |
| `gcc (Raspbian 8.3.0-6+rpi1) 8.3.0` on a Raspberry Pi 3 (revision
 | |
| a02082). It was difficult to get stable results in this benchmark.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | Linux (RPi3)         | ticks |
 | |
| | -------------------- | ----- |
 | |
| | 1 stepper            | 160   |
 | |
| | 3 stepper            | 380   |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Command dispatch benchmark
 | |
| 
 | |
| The command dispatch benchmark tests how many "dummy" commands the
 | |
| micro-controller can process. It is primarily a test of the hardware
 | |
| communication mechanism. The test is run using the console.py tool
 | |
| (described in [Debugging.md](Debugging.md)). The following is
 | |
| cut-and-paste into the console.py terminal window:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| DELAY {clock + 2*freq} get_uptime
 | |
| FLOOD 100000 0.0 debug_nop
 | |
| get_uptime
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| When the test completes, determine the difference between the clocks
 | |
| reported in the two "uptime" response messages. The total number of
 | |
| commands per second is then `100000 * mcu_frequency / clock_diff`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that this test may saturate the USB/CPU capacity of a Raspberry
 | |
| Pi. If running on a Raspberry Pi, Beaglebone, or similar host computer
 | |
| then increase the delay (eg, `DELAY {clock + 20*freq} get_uptime`).
 | |
| Where applicable, the benchmarks below are with console.py running on
 | |
| a desktop class machine with the device connected via a high-speed
 | |
| hub.
 | |
| 
 | |
| | MCU                 | Rate | Build    | Build compiler      |
 | |
| | ------------------- | ---- | -------- | ------------------- |
 | |
| | stm32f042 (CAN)     |  18K | c105adc8 | arm-none-eabi-gcc (GNU Tools 7-2018-q3-update) 7.3.1 |
 | |
| | atmega2560 (serial) |  23K | b161a69e | avr-gcc (GCC) 4.8.1 |
 | |
| | sam3x8e (serial)    |  23K | b161a69e | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.1.0-5.fc27) 7.1.0 |
 | |
| | at90usb1286 (USB)   |  75K | 01d2183f | avr-gcc (GCC) 5.4.0 |
 | |
| | samd21 (USB)        | 223K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | pru (shared memory) | 260K | c5968a08 | pru-gcc (GCC) 8.0.0 20170530 (experimental) |
 | |
| | stm32f103 (USB)     | 355K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | sam3x8e (USB)       | 418K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | lpc1768 (USB)       | 534K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | lpc1769 (USB)       | 628K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | sam4s8c (USB)       | 650K | 8d4a5c16 | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | samd51 (USB)        | 864K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | stm32f446 (USB)     | 870K | 01d2183f | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 7.4.0-1.fc30) 7.4.0 |
 | |
| | rp2040 (USB)        | 873K | c5667193 | arm-none-eabi-gcc (Fedora 10.2.0-4.fc34) 10.2.0 |
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Host Benchmarks
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is possible to run timing tests on the host software using the
 | |
| "batch mode" processing mechanism (described in
 | |
| [Debugging.md](Debugging.md)). This is typically done by choosing a
 | |
| large and complex G-Code file and timing how long it takes for the
 | |
| host software to process it. For example:
 | |
| ```
 | |
| time ~/klippy-env/bin/python ./klippy/klippy.py config/example-cartesian.cfg -i something_complex.gcode -o /dev/null -d out/klipper.dict
 | |
| ```
 |