mirror of
https://github.com/zadam/trilium.git
synced 2025-10-27 16:26:31 +01:00
small sync fixes and refactorings
This commit is contained in:
@@ -160,8 +160,7 @@ class AbstractBeccaEntity {
|
||||
|
||||
if (this.hasStringContent()) {
|
||||
content = content.toString();
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
content = Buffer.isBuffer(content) ? content : Buffer.from(content);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -184,32 +183,32 @@ class AbstractBeccaEntity {
|
||||
this.save();
|
||||
|
||||
if (newBlobId !== oldBlobId) {
|
||||
this.#deleteBlobIfNoteUsed(oldBlobId);
|
||||
this.#deleteBlobIfNotUsed(oldBlobId);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#deleteBlobIfNoteUsed(blobId) {
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM notes WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [blobId])) {
|
||||
#deleteBlobIfNotUsed(oldBlobId) {
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM notes WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [oldBlobId])) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM attachments WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [blobId])) {
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM attachments WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [oldBlobId])) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM revisions WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [blobId])) {
|
||||
if (sql.getValue("SELECT 1 FROM revisions WHERE blobId = ? LIMIT 1", [oldBlobId])) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sql.execute("DELETE FROM blobs WHERE blobId = ?", [blobId]);
|
||||
sql.execute("DELETE FROM entity_changes WHERE entityName = 'blobs' AND entityId = ?", [blobId]);
|
||||
sql.execute("DELETE FROM blobs WHERE blobId = ?", [oldBlobId]);
|
||||
sql.execute("DELETE FROM entity_changes WHERE entityName = 'blobs' AND entityId = ?", [oldBlobId]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#getUnencryptedContentForHashCalculation(unencryptedContent) {
|
||||
if (this.isProtected) {
|
||||
// a "random" prefix make sure that the calculated hash/blobId is different for an encrypted note and decrypted
|
||||
// a "random" prefix makes sure that the calculated hash/blobId is different for a decrypted/encrypted content
|
||||
const encryptedPrefixSuffix = "t$[nvQg7q)&_ENCRYPTED_?M:Bf&j3jr_";
|
||||
return Buffer.isBuffer(unencryptedContent)
|
||||
? Buffer.concat([Buffer.from(encryptedPrefixSuffix), unencryptedContent])
|
||||
@@ -224,7 +223,7 @@ class AbstractBeccaEntity {
|
||||
* We're using the unencrypted blob for the hash calculation, because otherwise the random IV would
|
||||
* cause every content blob to be unique which would balloon the database size (esp. with revisioning).
|
||||
* This has minor security implications (it's easy to infer that given content is shared between different
|
||||
* notes/attachments, but the trade-off comes out clearly positive).
|
||||
* notes/attachments), but the trade-off comes out clearly positive.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const newBlobId = utils.hashedBlobId(unencryptedContentForHashCalculation);
|
||||
const blobNeedsInsert = !sql.getValue('SELECT 1 FROM blobs WHERE blobId = ?', [newBlobId]);
|
||||
@@ -242,7 +241,9 @@ class AbstractBeccaEntity {
|
||||
|
||||
sql.upsert("blobs", "blobId", pojo);
|
||||
|
||||
const hash = utils.hash(`${newBlobId}|${pojo.content.toString()}`);
|
||||
// we can't reuse blobId as an entity_changes hash, because this one has to be calculatable without having
|
||||
// access to the decrypted content
|
||||
const hash = blobService.calculateContentHash(pojo);
|
||||
|
||||
entityChangesService.addEntityChange({
|
||||
entityName: 'blobs',
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user